Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with granite 4.2 3b and gpt-oss-20b, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

granite 4.2 3b vs gpt-oss-20b

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of granite 4.2 3b and gpt-oss-20b
Field
granite 4.2 3b

IBM Granite

ModelCap position#138#135
Index score25.627.9
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.03
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.13
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context131K131K
Providers012
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • granite 4.2 3b is #138; gpt-oss-20b is #135 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 25.6 for granite 4.2 3b and 27.9 for gpt-oss-20b. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for granite 4.2 3b and 131,072 for gpt-oss-20b.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for granite 4.2 3b and 12 for gpt-oss-20b.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.