Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with granite 3.3 2b instruct and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

granite 3.3 2b instruct vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 3:10:38 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of granite 3.3 2b instruct and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
Field
ModelCap position#220#216
Index score8.810.4
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 203 held-out anchors (22%); opens from measured predecessor ibm-granite/granite-3.1-2b-instruct (78%); shrunk 2.2 up toward the measured corpusMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$2.00
Output / 1MUnavailable$6.00
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—66K
Providers01
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • granite 3.3 2b instruct is #220; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is #216 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 8.8 for granite 3.3 2b instruct and 10.4 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: granite 3.3 2b instruct is Estimated; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is Measured.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for granite 3.3 2b instruct and 1 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.