Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Gemma 4 31B and GPT-6.1 Sol, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Live dataset updated 10/2/2026, 11:14:31 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Gemma 4 31B | GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #28 | #4 |
| Index score | 71.8 | 83.5 |
| Evidence | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards | Measured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.09 | $2.00 |
| Output / 1M | $0.34 | $10.00 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Providers | 13 | 3 |
| Weight access | Open weights | No linked weights |
Decision facts
- Gemma 4 31B is #28; GPT-6.1 Sol is #4 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 71.8 for Gemma 4 31B and 83.5 for GPT-6.1 Sol. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.34 for Gemma 4 31B and $10.00 for GPT-6.1 Sol. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.35 for Gemma 4 31B versus $9.00 for GPT-6.1 Sol. Gemma 4 31B costs 96.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 262,144 tokens for Gemma 4 31B and 1,050,000 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
- Weight access differs: Gemma 4 31B is open; GPT-6.1 Sol is none.
- ModelCap currently lists 13 providers for Gemma 4 31B and 3 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#5 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#5 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.