Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 4 26B A4B and gemma 4 E2B it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs gemma 4 E2B it

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 4 26B A4B and gemma 4 E2B it
Field
ModelCap position#36#106
Index score65.039.3
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 5 rows (91%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2.7 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$0.07Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.34Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context262K—
Providers90
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 4 26B A4B is #36; gemma 4 E2B it is #106 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 65.0 for Gemma 4 26B A4B and 39.3 for gemma 4 E2B it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma 4 26B A4B is Measured; gemma 4 E2B it is Estimated.
  • ModelCap currently lists 9 providers for Gemma 4 26B A4B and 0 for gemma 4 E2B it.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.