Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 4 12B it and Laguna S 2.1, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 4 12B it vs Laguna S 2.1

Live dataset updated 9/14/2026, 10:53:04 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 4 12B it and Laguna S 2.1
Field
Laguna S 2.1

Poolside

ModelCap position#47#44
Index score60.562.2
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.2 up toward the measured corpusEstimated5 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (68%); global-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (32%); shrunk 4.9 toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.09
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.18
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—1M
Providers01
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • gemma 4 12B it is #47; Laguna S 2.1 is #44 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 60.5 for gemma 4 12B it and 62.2 for Laguna S 2.1. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Both positions use Estimated evidence.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 4 12B it is open; Laguna S 2.1 is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 4 12B it and 1 for Laguna S 2.1.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.