Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 4 12B it and Gemma 4 31B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 4 12B it vs Gemma 4 31B

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 4 12B it and Gemma 4 31B
Field
ModelCap position#44#27
Index score61.469.7
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.3 up toward the measured corpusMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.09
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.34
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers013
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 4 12B it is #44; Gemma 4 31B is #27 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 61.4 for gemma 4 12B it and 69.7 for Gemma 4 31B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: gemma 4 12B it is Estimated; Gemma 4 31B is Measured.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 4 12B it and 13 for Gemma 4 31B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.