Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 4 12B it and Gemma 4 26B A4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 4 12B it vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 4 12B it and Gemma 4 26B A4B
Field
ModelCap position#44#36
Index score61.465.0
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.3 up toward the measured corpusMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.07
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.34
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers09
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 4 12B it is #44; Gemma 4 26B A4B is #36 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 61.4 for gemma 4 12B it and 65.0 for Gemma 4 26B A4B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: gemma 4 12B it is Estimated; Gemma 4 26B A4B is Measured.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 4 12B it and 9 for Gemma 4 26B A4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.