Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 3n E4B it and gemma 4 12B it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 3n E4B it vs gemma 4 12B it

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 3n E4B it and gemma 4 12B it
Field
ModelCap position#142#44
Index score23.561.4
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.3 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context33K—
Providers00
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 3n E4B it is #142; gemma 4 12B it is #44 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 23.5 for gemma 3n E4B it and 61.4 for gemma 4 12B it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Evidence differs: gemma 3n E4B it is Measured; gemma 4 12B it is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 3n E4B it is gated; gemma 4 12B it is open.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.