Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 4B and gemma 4 E2B it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 4B vs gemma 4 E2B it

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 4B and gemma 4 E2B it
Field
ModelCap position#146#106
Index score19.339.3
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 5 rows (91%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2.7 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$0.05Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.10Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K—
Providers10
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 4B is #146; gemma 4 E2B it is #106 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 19.3 for Gemma 3 4B and 39.3 for gemma 4 E2B it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma 3 4B is Measured; gemma 4 E2B it is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 4B is gated; gemma 4 E2B it is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Gemma 3 4B and 0 for gemma 4 E2B it.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.