Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and Falcon H1 34B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs Falcon H1 34B Instruct

Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 5:33:33 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and Falcon H1 34B Instruct
Field
ModelCap position#121#119
Index score37.438.8
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 187 held-out anchors (46%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 11 rows (54%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 11.1 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$0.08Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.45Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K—
Providers40
Weight accessGated accessRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #121; Falcon H1 34B Instruct is #119 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 37.4 for Gemma 3 27B and 38.8 for Falcon H1 34B Instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma 3 27B is Measured; Falcon H1 34B Instruct is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 27B is gated; Falcon H1 34B Instruct is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Gemma 3 27B and 0 for Falcon H1 34B Instruct.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.