Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and gemma 4 E2B it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs gemma 4 E2B it

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and gemma 4 E2B it
Field
ModelCap position#115#106
Index score35.939.3
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 5 rows (91%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2.7 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$0.08Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.45Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K—
Providers40
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #115; gemma 4 E2B it is #106 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 35.9 for Gemma 3 27B and 39.3 for gemma 4 E2B it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma 3 27B is Measured; gemma 4 E2B it is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 27B is gated; gemma 4 E2B it is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Gemma 3 27B and 0 for gemma 4 E2B it.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.