Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 2 9b it and Phi 4, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 2 9b it vs Phi 4

Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 3:10:38 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 2 9b it and Phi 4
Field
Phi 4

Microsoft

ModelCap position#206#207
Index score15.913.8
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.07
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.14
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—16K
Providers01
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 2 9b it is #206; Phi 4 is #207 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 15.9 for gemma 2 9b it and 13.8 for Phi 4. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 2 9b it is gated; Phi 4 is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 2 9b it and 1 for Phi 4.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.