Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 2 2b jpn it and Gemma 4 31B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 2 2b jpn it vs Gemma 4 31B

Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 3:10:38 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 2 2b jpn it and Gemma 4 31B
Field
ModelCap position#240#28
Index score6.371.4
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-2-2b-it · finetune (100%)Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.09
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.34
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers012
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 2 2b jpn it is #240; Gemma 4 31B is #28 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 6.3 for gemma 2 2b jpn it and 71.4 for Gemma 4 31B. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Evidence differs: gemma 2 2b jpn it is Inherited; Gemma 4 31B is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 2 2b jpn it is gated; Gemma 4 31B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 2 2b jpn it and 12 for Gemma 4 31B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.