Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemini 3.8 Flash and gemma 3n E4B it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs gemma 3n E4B it

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 4:53:57 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash and gemma 3n E4B it
Field
ModelCap position#11#177
Index score76.419.3
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.75Unavailable
Output / 1M$3.75Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context1M33K
Providers20
Weight accessAPI onlyGated access

Decision facts

  • Gemini 3.8 Flash is #11; gemma 3n E4B it is #177 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 76.4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 19.3 for gemma 3n E4B it.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 32,768 for gemma 3n E4B it.
  • Weight access differs: Gemini 3.8 Flash is none; gemma 3n E4B it is gated.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 0 for gemma 3n E4B it.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.