Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemini 3.8 Flash and gemma 3n E4B it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

First modelSecond model

Current public data

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs gemma 3n E4B it

Live dataset updated 10/18/2026, 4:49:00 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt

Factual comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash and gemma 3n E4B it
Field	Gemini 3.8 Flash Google	gemma 3n E4B it Google
ModelCap position	#5	#212
Index score	83.5	30.8
Evidence	Measured5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards	Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M	$0.825	Unavailable
Output / 1M	$4.13	Unavailable
Pricing status	fresh	unavailable
Context	1M	33K
Providers	2	0
Weight access	No linked weights	Gated access

Decision facts

Gemini 3.8 Flash is #5; gemma 3n E4B it is #212 on the same current language board.
Index scores are 83.5 for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 30.8 for gemma 3n E4B it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
Both positions use Measured evidence.
Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 32,768 for gemma 3n E4B it.
Weight access differs: Gemini 3.8 Flash is none; gemma 3n E4B it is gated.
ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 0 for gemma 3n E4B it.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Popular comparisons

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.