Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemma 3 27B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemma 3 27B

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 4:53:57 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
Field
ModelCap position#11#90
Index score76.428.5
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.75$0.08
Output / 1M$3.75$0.45
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M131K
Providers24
Weight accessAPI onlyGated access

Decision facts

  • Gemini 3.8 Flash is #11; Gemma 3 27B is #90 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 76.4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 28.5 for Gemma 3 27B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $3.75 for Gemini 3.8 Flash and $0.45 for Gemma 3 27B.
  • Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 131,072 for Gemma 3 27B.
  • Weight access differs: Gemini 3.8 Flash is none; Gemma 3 27B is gated.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 4 for Gemma 3 27B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.