Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and gemma 4 E2B it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs gemma 4 E2B it

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and gemma 4 E2B it
Field
ModelCap position#30#106
Index score67.139.3
EvidenceMeasured5 public benchmark observations across 5 boardsEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 5 rows (91%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2.7 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$0.30Unavailable
Output / 1M$2.50Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context1M—
Providers20
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is #30; gemma 4 E2B it is #106 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 67.1 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 39.3 for gemma 4 E2B it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Evidence differs: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is Measured; gemma 4 E2B it is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is none; gemma 4 E2B it is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 0 for gemma 4 E2B it.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.