Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Grok 4.7, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Grok 4.7
Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 1:40:35 AM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 DeepSeek | Grok 4.7 xAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #25 | #4 |
| Index score | 76.0 | 85.0 |
| Evidence | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards | Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board |
| Input / 1M | $1.32 | $1.60 |
| Output / 1M | $3.96 | $4.80 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 1M | 500K |
| Providers | 22 | 1 |
| Weight access | Open weights | API only |
Decision facts
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is #25; Grok 4.7 is #4 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 76.0 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 85.0 for Grok 4.7. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $3.96 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $4.80 for Grok 4.7. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.62 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $5.60 for Grok 4.7. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs 17.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 500,000 for Grok 4.7.
- Weight access differs: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open; Grok 4.7 is none.
- ModelCap currently lists 22 providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 1 for Grok 4.7.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.7#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.7#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Grok 4.7#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#6 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.