Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Laguna XS 2.1, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Laguna XS 2.1
Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus DeepSeek | Laguna XS 2.1 Poolside |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #62 | #61 |
| Index score | 54.0 | 54.1 |
| Evidence | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards | Estimated3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (30%); global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (70%); shrunk 1.4 toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $0.27 | $0.06 |
| Output / 1M | $1.00 | $0.12 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 164K | 262K |
| Providers | 4 | 1 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Restricted license |
Decision facts
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is #62; Laguna XS 2.1 is #61 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 54.0 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 54.1 for Laguna XS 2.1. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is Measured; Laguna XS 2.1 is Estimated.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.00 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and $0.12 for Laguna XS 2.1. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.04 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus versus $0.18 for Laguna XS 2.1. Laguna XS 2.1 costs 82.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 163,840 tokens for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 262,144 for Laguna XS 2.1.
- Weight access differs: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is open; Laguna XS 2.1 is restricted.
- ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 1 for Laguna XS 2.1.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.