Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Laguna XS.2, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

First modelSecond model

Current public data

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Laguna XS.2

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt

Factual comparison of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Laguna XS.2
Field	DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus DeepSeek	Laguna XS.2 Poolside
ModelCap position	#62	#60
Index score	54.0	54.3
Evidence	Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards	Estimated4 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (62%); global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (38%); shrunk 0.5 toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M	$0.27	Unavailable
Output / 1M	$1.00	Unavailable
Pricing status	fresh	unavailable
Context	164K	—
Providers	4	0
Weight access	Open weights	Open weights

Decision facts

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is #62; Laguna XS.2 is #60 on the same current language board.
Index scores are 54.0 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 54.3 for Laguna XS.2. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Evidence differs: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is Measured; Laguna XS.2 is Estimated.
ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 0 for Laguna XS.2.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Popular comparisons

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.