Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with North Mini Code and GLM 5 Turbo, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
North Mini Code vs GLM 5 Turbo
Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 3:10:38 AM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | North Mini Code Cohere | GLM 5 Turbo Z.ai |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #95 | #92 |
| Index score | 51.9 | 52.6 |
| Evidence | Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board | Measuredpublisher-corpus-prior over 203 held-out anchors (64%); 1 specialist-board observation at 1.2% support (36%); shrunk 23.8 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | Free | $1.20 |
| Output / 1M | Free | $4.00 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 256K | 203K |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Weight access | Open weights | API only |
Decision facts
- North Mini Code is #95; GLM 5 Turbo is #92 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 51.9 for North Mini Code and 52.6 for GLM 5 Turbo. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0 for North Mini Code and $4.00 for GLM 5 Turbo. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0 for North Mini Code versus $4.40 for GLM 5 Turbo. North Mini Code costs 100.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 256,000 tokens for North Mini Code and 202,752 for GLM 5 Turbo.
- Weight access differs: North Mini Code is open; GLM 5 Turbo is none.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.7#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.7#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Grok 4.7#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#6 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.