Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with North Mini Code and granite 4.2 30b, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

North Mini Code vs granite 4.2 30b

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of North Mini Code and granite 4.2 30b
Field
granite 4.2 30b

IBM Granite

ModelCap position#127#126
Index score32.232.5
EvidenceEstimated3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (55%); publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (45%); shrunk 14.4 toward the measured corpusMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MFreeUnavailable
Output / 1MFreeUnavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context256K131K
Providers10
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • North Mini Code is #127; granite 4.2 30b is #126 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 32.2 for North Mini Code and 32.5 for granite 4.2 30b. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: North Mini Code is Estimated; granite 4.2 30b is Measured.
  • Published context is 256,000 tokens for North Mini Code and 131,072 for granite 4.2 30b.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for North Mini Code and 0 for granite 4.2 30b.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.