Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Command A and EXAONE 4.0.1 32B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Command A vs EXAONE 4.0.1 32B

Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 3:10:38 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Command A and EXAONE 4.0.1 32B
Field
Command A

Cohere

EXAONE 4.0.1 32B

LGAI EXAONE

ModelCap position#134#131
Index score38.241.1
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 203 held-out anchors (14%); launch card against 8 resolved peers on 8 rows (86%); optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 2.2 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$2.50Unavailable
Output / 1M$10.00Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context256K—
Providers10
Weight accessGated accessRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Command A is #134; EXAONE 4.0.1 32B is #131 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 38.2 for Command A and 41.1 for EXAONE 4.0.1 32B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Command A is Measured; EXAONE 4.0.1 32B is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: Command A is gated; EXAONE 4.0.1 32B is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Command A and 0 for EXAONE 4.0.1 32B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.