Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemma 4 31B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemma 4 31B
Live dataset updated 10/2/2026, 11:14:31 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #5 | #28 |
| Index score | 82.4 | 71.8 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards |
| Input / 1M | $2.00 | $0.09 |
| Output / 1M | $10.00 | $0.34 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Providers | 5 | 13 |
| Weight access | No linked weights | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 is #5; Gemma 4 31B is #28 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 82.4 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 71.8 for Gemma 4 31B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $10.00 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and $0.34 for Gemma 4 31B. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $9.00 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 versus $0.35 for Gemma 4 31B. Gemma 4 31B costs 96.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 262,144 for Gemma 4 31B.
- Weight access differs: Claude Sonnet 5.5 is none; Gemma 4 31B is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 13 for Gemma 4 31B.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#5 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#5 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.