Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Claude Haiku 4.5 and K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B

Live dataset updated 9/10/2026, 1:00:55 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Claude Haiku 4.5 and K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B
Field
ModelCap position#62#61
Index score55.055.2
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 183 held-out anchors (59%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 8 rows (41%); exceeds every named peer on 2 of 8 rows; optimism haircut 1.82 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 2.4 toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$1.00Unavailable
Output / 1M$5.00Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context200K
Providers40
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 is #62; K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B is #61 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 55.0 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 55.2 for K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Claude Haiku 4.5 is Measured; K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: Claude Haiku 4.5 is none; K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 0 for K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.