Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Olmo 3.1 32B Think and Phi 4, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Olmo 3.1 32B Think vs Phi 4

Live dataset updated 9/10/2026, 3:47:06 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Olmo 3.1 32B Think and Phi 4
Field
Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Allen Institute

Phi 4

Microsoft

ModelCap position#159#162
Index score17.112.6
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.07
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.14
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—16K
Providers01
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Olmo 3.1 32B Think is #159; Phi 4 is #162 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 17.1 for Olmo 3.1 32B Think and 12.6 for Phi 4. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Olmo 3.1 32B Think and 1 for Phi 4.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.