Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Bolmo 7B and granite 3.3 8b instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Bolmo 7B vs granite 3.3 8b instruct

Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 3:10:38 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Bolmo 7B and granite 3.3 8b instruct
Field
Bolmo 7B

Allen Institute

ModelCap position#222#221
Index score8.68.7
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of allenai/Olmo-3-1025-7B · finetune (100%)Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 203 held-out anchors (8%); opens above measured predecessor ibm-granite/granite-3.1-8b-instruct on same-family ordering evidence (30%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 5 rows (62%); exceeds every named peer on 2 of 5 rows; optimism haircut 1.61 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.8 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context——
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Bolmo 7B is #222; granite 3.3 8b instruct is #221 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 8.6 for Bolmo 7B and 8.7 for granite 3.3 8b instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Bolmo 7B is Inherited; granite 3.3 8b instruct is Estimated.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.