Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 and Qwen3 30B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Live dataset updated 9/10/2026, 4:03:07 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 and Qwen3 30B A3B
Field
ModelCap position#142#144
Index score29.028.3
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-3-12b-it · finetune (100%)Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.12
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.50
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—131K
Providers02
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 is #142; Qwen3 30B A3B is #144 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 29.0 for Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 and 28.3 for Qwen3 30B A3B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 is Inherited; Qwen3 30B A3B is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 is restricted; Qwen3 30B A3B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 and 2 for Qwen3 30B A3B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.