Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (Qwen) and Qwen3 30B A3B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 7 November 2026

As of 7 November 2026, Qwen3 30B A3B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#213 vs #276); Qwen3 30B A3B is 2× cheaper per output token ($0.50/1M vs $1.00/1M); and Qwen3 30B A3B offers the longer context window (41K vs 33K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct leads Qwen3 30B A3B for this pair.

Choose Qwen3 30B A3B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #213 against #276 (34.0 vs 22.4 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.50/1M output tokens against $1.00/1M, about 2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.12/1M against $0.66/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 41K tokens against 33K.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1327 against 1271.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1385 against 1342.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3 30B A3B was listed 28 April 2025, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 11 November 2024.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B
FieldQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwenQwen3 30B A3BQwen
ModelCap Index position#276#213
Index score22.434.0
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.66$0.12
Output price / 1M tokens$1.00$0.50
Context window33K tokens41K tokens
Declared route output cap29K16K
API providers listed11
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed11 November 202428 April 2025
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Public benchmark boards where Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3 30B A3B has a published result
BoardQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 30B A3BLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)12711262–1279Not reported13271322–1331Not reportedQwen3 30B A3B
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13421323–136013851376–1393Qwen3 30B A3B
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)9.0%—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B: common questions

Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct better than Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 7 November 2026: #213 against #276. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B is cheaper on output tokens: $0.50/1M against $1.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.66/1M for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and $0.12/1M for Qwen3 30B A3B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.82 for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct versus $0.49 for Qwen3 30B A3B. Qwen3 30B A3B costs 73.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B has the larger context window: 41K tokens against 33K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Arena coding: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 1342, Qwen3 30B A3B 1385 — Qwen3 30B A3B leads.

Are Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B open-weight models?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: Open weights. Qwen3 30B A3B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and 1 for Qwen3 30B A3B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 7 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further