Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (Qwen) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 7 November 2026

As of 7 November 2026, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#114 vs #276); Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is 3.5× cheaper per output token ($1.00/1M vs $3.50/1M); and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 offers the longer context window (128K vs 33K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…

  • API cost matters — $1.00/1M output tokens against $3.50/1M, about 3.5× cheaper.

Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #114 against #276 (52.8 vs 22.4 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.45/1M against $0.66/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 128K tokens against 33K.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1400 against 1271.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1442 against 1342.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 was listed 25 July 2025, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 11 November 2024.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
FieldQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwenQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
ModelCap Index position#276#114
Index score22.452.8
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.66$0.45
Output price / 1M tokens$1.00$3.50
Context window33K tokens128K tokens
Declared route output cap29K16K
API providers listed11
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed11 November 202425 July 2025
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Public benchmark boards where Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a published result
BoardQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leads
Arena textArena (LMArena)12711262–1279Not reported14001393–1406Not reportedQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13421323–136014421427–1456Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)9.0%—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: common questions

Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 7 November 2026: #114 against #276. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens: $1.00/1M against $3.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.66/1M for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and $0.45/1M for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.82 for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct versus $2.65 for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs 31.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has the larger context window: 128K tokens against 33K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Arena coding: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 1342, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 1442 — Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads.

Are Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 open-weight models?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: Open weights. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and 1 for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 7 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further