Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs o4 Mini

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b (OpenAI) and o4 Mini (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, o4 Mini holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#107 vs #170); gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is 14.7× cheaper per output token ($0.30/1M vs $4.40/1M); o4 Mini offers the longer context window (200K vs 131K tokens); and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose gpt-oss-safeguard-20b if…

  • API cost matters — $0.30/1M output tokens against $4.40/1M, about 14.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.075/1M against $1.10/1M.
  • you want to self-host: gpt-oss-safeguard-20b ships open weights while o4 Mini is api only.
  • you want the more recently listed model — gpt-oss-safeguard-20b was listed 29 October 2025, o4 Mini 16 April 2025.

Choose o4 Mini if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #107 against #170 (51.6 vs 31.3 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 200K tokens against 131K.

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs o4 Mini: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and o4 Mini
Fieldgpt-oss-safeguard-20bOpenAIo4 MiniOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#170#107
Index score31.351.6
EvidenceInheritedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.075$1.10
Output price / 1M tokens$0.30$4.40
Context window131K tokens200K tokens
Max output tokens66K100K
API providers listed11
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesTextImage, Text, File
First listed29 October 202516 April 2025
PublisherOpenAIOpenAI

Evidence: finetune of openai/gpt-oss-20b · fp4 (100%) · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs o4 Mini

Public benchmark boards where gpt-oss-safeguard-20b or o4 Mini has a published result
Boardgpt-oss-safeguard-20bo4 MiniLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14331426–1440Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation6.1%HighOnly one result
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)45.0%Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)53.2Function callingOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis55.6%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="o4-mini (high)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis16.5%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="o4-mini (high)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs o4 Mini: common questions

Is gpt-oss-safeguard-20b better than o4 Mini?

o4 Mini ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #107 against #170. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is gpt-oss-safeguard-20b cheaper than o4 Mini?

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is cheaper on output tokens: $0.30/1M against $4.40/1M. Input tokens are $0.075/1M for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and $1.10/1M for o4 Mini. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.30 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b versus $4.40 for o4 Mini. gpt-oss-safeguard-20b costs 93.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b or o4 Mini?

o4 Mini has the larger context window: 200K tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b or o4 Mini?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and o4 Mini open-weight models?

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b: Open weights. o4 Mini: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and o4 Mini?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and 1 for o4 Mini, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs o4 Mini comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further