Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Llama 4 Scout vs gpt-oss-safeguard-20b

Llama 4 Scout (Meta) and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 19 September 2026

As of 19 September 2026, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#164 vs #166); Llama 4 Scout offers the longer context window (1.3M vs 131K tokens); and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Llama 4 Scout if…

  • you need the longer context window — 1.3M tokens against 131K.
  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 1.

Choose gpt-oss-safeguard-20b if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #164 against #166 (27.0 vs 25.8 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.075/1M against $0.10/1M.
  • you want to self-host: gpt-oss-safeguard-20b ships open weights while Llama 4 Scout is gated access.
  • you want the more recently listed model — gpt-oss-safeguard-20b was listed 29 October 2025, Llama 4 Scout 5 April 2025.

Llama 4 Scout vs gpt-oss-safeguard-20b: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Llama 4 Scout and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b
FieldLlama 4 ScoutMetagpt-oss-safeguard-20bOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#166#164
Index score25.827.0
EvidenceMeasuredInherited
Input price / 1M tokens$0.10$0.075
Output price / 1M tokens$0.30$0.30
Context window1.3M tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens16K66K
API providers listed31
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
First listed5 April 202529 October 2025
PublisherMetaOpenAI

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · finetune of openai/gpt-oss-20b · fp4 (100%). Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Llama 4 Scout vs gpt-oss-safeguard-20b

Public benchmark boards where Llama 4 Scout or gpt-oss-safeguard-20b has a published result
BoardLlama 4 Scoutgpt-oss-safeguard-20bLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13621354–1371Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation0.0%Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)28.1Function callingOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis15.5%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Llama 4 Scout":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis3.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Llama 4 Scout":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Llama 4 Scout vs gpt-oss-safeguard-20b: common questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than gpt-oss-safeguard-20b?

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 19 September 2026: #164 against #166. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than gpt-oss-safeguard-20b?

Both list the same output price, $0.30/1M tokens, with input at $0.10/1M and $0.075/1M respectively. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.35 for Llama 4 Scout versus $0.30 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b. gpt-oss-safeguard-20b costs 14.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or gpt-oss-safeguard-20b?

Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window: 1.3M tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Scout or gpt-oss-safeguard-20b?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Llama 4 Scout and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b open-weight models?

Llama 4 Scout: Gated access. gpt-oss-safeguard-20b: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Llama 4 Scout and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b?

ModelCap currently lists 3 API providers for Llama 4 Scout and 1 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Llama 4 Scout vs gpt-oss-safeguard-20b comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 19 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further