Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Nemotron 3 Super vs gpt-oss-120b

Nemotron 3 Super (NVIDIA) and gpt-oss-120b (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, Nemotron 3 Super holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#120 vs #125); gpt-oss-120b is 2.6× cheaper per output token ($0.17/1M vs $0.45/1M); Nemotron 3 Super offers the longer context window (262K vs 131K tokens); and gpt-oss-120b ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Nemotron 3 Super if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #120 against #125 (37.8 vs 34.8 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 131K.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1408 against 1391.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Nemotron 3 Super was listed 11 March 2026, gpt-oss-120b 5 August 2025.

Choose gpt-oss-120b if…

  • API cost matters — $0.17/1M output tokens against $0.45/1M, about 2.6× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.037/1M against $0.08/1M.
  • you want to self-host: gpt-oss-120b ships open weights while Nemotron 3 Super is restricted license.
  • you want provider choice — 20 listed API providers against 2.

Nemotron 3 Super vs gpt-oss-120b: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Nemotron 3 Super and gpt-oss-120b
FieldNemotron 3 SuperNVIDIAgpt-oss-120bOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#120#125
Index score37.834.8
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.08$0.037
Output price / 1M tokens$0.45$0.17
Context window262K tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens236K118K
API providers listed220
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed11 March 20265 August 2025
PublisherNVIDIAOpenAI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Nemotron 3 Super vs gpt-oss-120b

Public benchmark boards where Nemotron 3 Super or gpt-oss-120b has a published result
BoardNemotron 3 Supergpt-oss-120bLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14081395–142213911383–1398Nemotron 3 Super
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)26.0%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis12.3intelligence-index:v4.3:highOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis26.2%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="gpt-oss-120b (high)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis65.8%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="gpt-oss-120b (high)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis19.6%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="gpt-oss-120b (high)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Nemotron 3 Super vs gpt-oss-120b: common questions

Is Nemotron 3 Super better than gpt-oss-120b?

Nemotron 3 Super ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #120 against #125. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Nemotron 3 Super cheaper than gpt-oss-120b?

gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on output tokens: $0.17/1M against $0.45/1M. Input tokens are $0.08/1M for Nemotron 3 Super and $0.037/1M for gpt-oss-120b. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.39 for Nemotron 3 Super versus $0.16 for gpt-oss-120b. gpt-oss-120b costs 58.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Super or gpt-oss-120b?

Nemotron 3 Super has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Super or gpt-oss-120b?

Arena coding: Nemotron 3 Super 1408, gpt-oss-120b 1391 — Nemotron 3 Super leads.

Are Nemotron 3 Super and gpt-oss-120b open-weight models?

Nemotron 3 Super: Restricted license. gpt-oss-120b: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Nemotron 3 Super and gpt-oss-120b?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Nemotron 3 Super and 20 for gpt-oss-120b, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Nemotron 3 Super vs gpt-oss-120b comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further