Mercury 2.5 (Inception Labs) and Nemotron 3 Super (NVIDIA) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 13 September 2026
As of 13 September 2026, Nemotron 3 Super holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#118 vs #121); Mercury 2.5 is 2.7× cheaper per output token ($0.15/1M vs $0.40/1M); and Nemotron 3 Super offers the longer context window (262K vs 260K tokens).
Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (23%); opens from measured predecessor inception/mercury-2 (77%); shrunk 4.4 up toward the measured corpus · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: Mercury 2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super
Public benchmark boards where Mercury 2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super has a published result
Nemotron 3 Super ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 13 September 2026: #118 against #121. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is Mercury 2.5 cheaper than Nemotron 3 Super?
Mercury 2.5 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.15/1M against $0.40/1M. Input tokens are $0.04/1M for Mercury 2.5 and $0.085/1M for Nemotron 3 Super. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.15 for Mercury 2.5 versus $0.37 for Nemotron 3 Super. Mercury 2.5 costs 58.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 260K.
Which is better for coding, Mercury 2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super?
The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.
Are Mercury 2.5 and Nemotron 3 Super open-weight models?
Mercury 2.5: API only. Nemotron 3 Super: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.
Where can I run Mercury 2.5 and Nemotron 3 Super?
ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Mercury 2.5 and 2 for Nemotron 3 Super, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Mercury 2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison?
Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 13 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.