Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Mercury 2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super

Mercury 2.5 (Inception Labs) and Nemotron 3 Super (NVIDIA) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 13 September 2026

As of 13 September 2026, Nemotron 3 Super holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#118 vs #121); Mercury 2.5 is 2.7× cheaper per output token ($0.15/1M vs $0.40/1M); and Nemotron 3 Super offers the longer context window (262K vs 260K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Mercury 2.5 if…

  • API cost matters — $0.15/1M output tokens against $0.40/1M, about 2.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.04/1M against $0.085/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Mercury 2.5 was listed 8 September 2026, Nemotron 3 Super 11 March 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3 Super if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #118 against #121 (37.7 vs 37.3 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 260K.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.

Mercury 2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Mercury 2.5 and Nemotron 3 Super
FieldMercury 2.5Inception LabsNemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
ModelCap Index position#121#118
Index score37.337.7
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.04$0.085
Output price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.40
Context window260K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens66K16K
API providers listed12
Weight accessAPI onlyRestricted license
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed8 September 202611 March 2026
PublisherInception LabsNVIDIA

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (23%); opens from measured predecessor inception/mercury-2 (77%); shrunk 4.4 up toward the measured corpus · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Mercury 2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super

Public benchmark boards where Mercury 2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super has a published result
BoardMercury 2.5Nemotron 3 SuperLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14081395–1422Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Mercury 2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super: common questions

Is Mercury 2.5 better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 13 September 2026: #118 against #121. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Mercury 2.5 cheaper than Nemotron 3 Super?

Mercury 2.5 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.15/1M against $0.40/1M. Input tokens are $0.04/1M for Mercury 2.5 and $0.085/1M for Nemotron 3 Super. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.15 for Mercury 2.5 versus $0.37 for Nemotron 3 Super. Mercury 2.5 costs 58.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 260K.

Which is better for coding, Mercury 2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Mercury 2.5 and Nemotron 3 Super open-weight models?

Mercury 2.5: API only. Nemotron 3 Super: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Mercury 2.5 and Nemotron 3 Super?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Mercury 2.5 and 2 for Nemotron 3 Super, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Mercury 2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 13 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further