Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen Drive 1.0 4B

Mercury 2.5 (Inception Labs) and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Mercury 2.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#111 vs #113); and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Mercury 2.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #111 against #113 (37.3 vs 37.2 points).
  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Mercury 2.5 was listed 8 September 2026, Qwen Drive 1.0 4B 27 August 2026.

Choose Qwen Drive 1.0 4B if…

  • you want to self-host: Qwen Drive 1.0 4B ships open weights while Mercury 2.5 is api only.

Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen Drive 1.0 4B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Mercury 2.5 and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B
FieldMercury 2.5Inception LabsQwen Drive 1.0 4BQwen
ModelCap Index position#111#113
Index score37.337.2
EvidenceEstimatedInherited
Input price / 1M tokens$0.04Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens$0.15Unlisted
Context window260K tokens— tokens
Max output tokens66K
API providers listed10
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed8 September 202627 August 2026
PublisherInception LabsQwen

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (23%); opens from measured predecessor inception/mercury-2 (78%); shrunk 4.7 up toward the measured corpus · finetune of Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B · finetune (100%). Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen Drive 1.0 4B

Neither model has a published result on a public benchmark board ModelCap tracks yet.

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen Drive 1.0 4B: common questions

Is Mercury 2.5 better than Qwen Drive 1.0 4B?

Mercury 2.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #111 against #113. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Mercury 2.5 cheaper than Qwen Drive 1.0 4B?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2.5 or Qwen Drive 1.0 4B?

Both publish a 260K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Mercury 2.5 or Qwen Drive 1.0 4B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Mercury 2.5 and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B open-weight models?

Mercury 2.5: API only. Qwen Drive 1.0 4B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Mercury 2.5 and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Mercury 2.5 and 0 for Qwen Drive 1.0 4B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen Drive 1.0 4B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further