Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Mercury 2.5 vs Fara1.5 4B

Mercury 2.5 (Inception Labs) and Fara1.5 4B (Microsoft) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Mercury 2.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#111 vs #112); and Fara1.5 4B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Mercury 2.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #111 against #112 (37.3 vs 37.2 points).
  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Mercury 2.5 was listed 8 September 2026, Fara1.5 4B 17 July 2026.

Choose Fara1.5 4B if…

  • you want to self-host: Fara1.5 4B ships open weights while Mercury 2.5 is api only.

Mercury 2.5 vs Fara1.5 4B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Mercury 2.5 and Fara1.5 4B
FieldMercury 2.5Inception LabsFara1.5 4BMicrosoft
ModelCap Index position#111#112
Index score37.337.2
EvidenceEstimatedInherited
Input price / 1M tokens$0.04Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens$0.15Unlisted
Context window260K tokens— tokens
Max output tokens66K
API providers listed10
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed8 September 202617 July 2026
PublisherInception LabsMicrosoft

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (23%); opens from measured predecessor inception/mercury-2 (78%); shrunk 4.7 up toward the measured corpus · finetune of Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B · finetune (100%). Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Mercury 2.5 vs Fara1.5 4B

Neither model has a published result on a public benchmark board ModelCap tracks yet.

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Mercury 2.5 vs Fara1.5 4B: common questions

Is Mercury 2.5 better than Fara1.5 4B?

Mercury 2.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #111 against #112. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Mercury 2.5 cheaper than Fara1.5 4B?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2.5 or Fara1.5 4B?

Both publish a 260K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Mercury 2.5 or Fara1.5 4B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Mercury 2.5 and Fara1.5 4B open-weight models?

Mercury 2.5: API only. Fara1.5 4B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Mercury 2.5 and Fara1.5 4B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Mercury 2.5 and 0 for Fara1.5 4B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Mercury 2.5 vs Fara1.5 4B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further