Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Kimi K3

Kimi K2 Thinking (Moonshot AI) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 7 November 2026

As of 7 November 2026, Kimi K3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#11 vs #66); Kimi K2 Thinking is 6.4× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $16.00/1M); and Kimi K3 offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Kimi K2 Thinking if…

  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $16.00/1M, about 6.4× cheaper.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #11 against #66 (80.8 vs 63.8 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.192/1M against $0.60/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want provider choice — 21 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1488 against 1430.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1538 against 1486.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Kimi K3 was listed 16 July 2026, Kimi K2 Thinking 6 November 2025.

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Kimi K3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Kimi K2 Thinking and Kimi K3
FieldKimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AIKimi K3Moonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#66#11
Index score63.880.8
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.60$0.192
Output price / 1M tokens$2.50$16.00
Context window262K tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap98K944K
API providers listed121
Weight accessRestricted licenseRestricted license
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
First listed6 November 202516 July 2026
PublisherMoonshot AIMoonshot AI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Kimi K2 Thinking vs Kimi K3

Public benchmark boards where Kimi K2 Thinking or Kimi K3 has a published result
BoardKimi K2 ThinkingKimi K3Leads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14301427–1433Turbo14881484–1492MaxKimi K3
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14861481–1492Turbo15381532–1545MaxKimi K3
LMArena AgentLMArena—0.8%0.3%–1.4%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation—60.4%MaxOnly one result
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)63.4%Thinking—Only one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench—54.5Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Kimi K3: common questions

Is Kimi K2 Thinking better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 7 November 2026: #11 against #66. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is Kimi K2 Thinking cheaper than Kimi K3?

Kimi K2 Thinking is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $16.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.60/1M for Kimi K2 Thinking and $0.192/1M for Kimi K3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.45 for Kimi K2 Thinking versus $8.38 for Kimi K3. Kimi K2 Thinking costs 70.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 Thinking or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K2 Thinking or Kimi K3?

Arena coding: Kimi K2 Thinking 1486, Kimi K3 1538 — Kimi K3 leads.

Are Kimi K2 Thinking and Kimi K3 open-weight models?

Kimi K2 Thinking: Restricted license. Kimi K3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Kimi K2 Thinking and Kimi K3?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Kimi K2 Thinking and 21 for Kimi K3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Kimi K2 Thinking vs Kimi K3 comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 7 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further