Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Mistral Small 4 vs GLM 4.6V

Mistral Small 4 (Mistral AI) and GLM 4.6V (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 12 September 2026

As of 12 September 2026, GLM 4.6V holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#104 vs #107); Mistral Small 4 is 1.5× cheaper per output token ($0.60/1M vs $0.90/1M); and Mistral Small 4 offers the longer context window (262K vs 131K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Mistral Small 4 if…

  • API cost matters — $0.60/1M output tokens against $0.90/1M, about 1.5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.30/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 131K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Mistral Small 4 was listed 16 March 2026, GLM 4.6V 8 December 2025.

Choose GLM 4.6V if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #104 against #107 (42.5 vs 41.5 points).

Mistral Small 4 vs GLM 4.6V: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Mistral Small 4 and GLM 4.6V
FieldMistral Small 4Mistral AIGLM 4.6VZ.ai
ModelCap Index position#107#104
Index score41.542.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.30
Output price / 1M tokens$0.60$0.90
Context window262K tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens210K33K
API providers listed22
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageImage, Text, Video
First listed16 March 20268 December 2025
PublisherMistral AIZ.ai

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Mistral Small 4 vs GLM 4.6V

Public benchmark boards where Mistral Small 4 or GLM 4.6V has a published result
BoardMistral Small 4GLM 4.6VLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)—14161391–1442Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis11.5intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified—Only one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis21.0%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Mistral Small 4":reasoning=true—Only one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis—30.7%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis—3.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Mistral Small 4 vs GLM 4.6V: common questions

Is Mistral Small 4 better than GLM 4.6V?

GLM 4.6V ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 12 September 2026: #104 against #107. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Mistral Small 4 cheaper than GLM 4.6V?

Mistral Small 4 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.60/1M against $0.90/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for Mistral Small 4 and $0.30/1M for GLM 4.6V. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for Mistral Small 4 versus $1.05 for GLM 4.6V. Mistral Small 4 costs 42.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Small 4 or GLM 4.6V?

Mistral Small 4 has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, Mistral Small 4 or GLM 4.6V?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Mistral Small 4 and GLM 4.6V open-weight models?

Mistral Small 4: Open weights. GLM 4.6V: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Mistral Small 4 and GLM 4.6V?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Mistral Small 4 and 2 for GLM 4.6V, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Mistral Small 4 vs GLM 4.6V comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 12 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further