Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Ling 3.0 tiny vs GLM 4.6V

Ling 3.0 tiny (InclusionAI) and GLM 4.6V (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 18 August 2026

As of 18 August 2026, GLM 4.6V holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#77 vs #79).

Which should you choose?

Choose Ling 3.0 tiny if…

  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 24.5 against 10.9.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Ling 3.0 tiny was listed 10 August 2026, GLM 4.6V 8 December 2025.

Choose GLM 4.6V if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #77 against #79 (33.2 vs 32.4 points).
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 0.

Ling 3.0 tiny vs GLM 4.6V: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Ling 3.0 tiny and GLM 4.6V
FieldLing 3.0 tinyInclusionAIGLM 4.6VZ.ai
ModelCap Index position#79#77
Index score32.433.2
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.30
Output price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.90
Context window— tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens—33K
API providers listed02
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextImage, Text, Video
First listed10 August 20268 December 2025
PublisherInclusionAIZ.ai

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Ling 3.0 tiny vs GLM 4.6V

Public benchmark boards where Ling 3.0 tiny or GLM 4.6V has a published result
BoardLing 3.0 tinyGLM 4.6VLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)—14171392–1442Only one result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis24.5intelligence-index10.9intelligence-indexLing 3.0 tiny

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Ling 3.0 tiny vs GLM 4.6V: common questions

Is Ling 3.0 tiny better than GLM 4.6V?

GLM 4.6V ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 18 August 2026: #77 against #79. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Ling 3.0 tiny cheaper than GLM 4.6V?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.0 tiny or GLM 4.6V?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Ling 3.0 tiny or GLM 4.6V?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Ling 3.0 tiny and GLM 4.6V open-weight models?

Ling 3.0 tiny: Open weights. GLM 4.6V: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Ling 3.0 tiny and GLM 4.6V?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for Ling 3.0 tiny and 2 for GLM 4.6V, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Ling 3.0 tiny vs GLM 4.6V comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 18 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further