Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Muse Spark Open vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Muse Spark Open (Meta) and GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 October 2026

As of 15 October 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#8 vs #15); and Muse Spark Open is 2.4× cheaper per output token ($4.25/1M vs $10.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Muse Spark Open if…

  • API cost matters — $4.25/1M output tokens against $10.00/1M, about 2.4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.25/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 3.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Spark Open was listed 15 October 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol 29 September 2026.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #8 against #15 (81.7 vs 79.6 points).
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 51.8 against 38.9.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 52.9% against 43.9%.

Muse Spark Open vs GPT-6.1 Sol: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Muse Spark Open and GPT-6.1 Sol
FieldMuse Spark OpenMetaGPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#15#8
Index score79.681.7
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$1.25$2.00
Output price / 1M tokens$4.25$10.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap944K128K
API providers listed43
Weight accessGated accessNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioFile, Image, Text
First listed15 October 202629 September 2026
PublisherMetaOpenAI

Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 213 held-out anchors (22%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 11 rows (78%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1 up toward the measured corpus · 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Muse Spark Open vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Public benchmark boards where Muse Spark Open or GPT-6.1 Sol has a published result
BoardMuse Spark OpenGPT-6.1 SolLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)—14841476–1492MaxOnly one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)—15381521–1556MaxOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena—14.8%12.8%–16.8%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation—94.2%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation—52.7%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis38.9X-High51.8MaxGPT-6.1 Sol
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis76.4%X-High—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis43.9%X-High52.9%MaxGPT-6.1 Sol
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)—58.2%55.1%–61.3%Codex · MaxOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Muse Spark Open vs GPT-6.1 Sol: common questions

Is Muse Spark Open better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 October 2026: #8 against #15. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Muse Spark Open cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol?

Muse Spark Open is cheaper on output tokens: $4.25/1M against $10.00/1M. Input tokens are $1.25/1M for Muse Spark Open and $2.00/1M for GPT-6.1 Sol. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.63 for Muse Spark Open versus $9.00 for GPT-6.1 Sol. Muse Spark Open costs 48.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark Open or GPT-6.1 Sol?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark Open or GPT-6.1 Sol?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Muse Spark Open and GPT-6.1 Sol open-weight models?

Muse Spark Open: Gated access. GPT-6.1 Sol: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Muse Spark Open and GPT-6.1 Sol?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Muse Spark Open and 3 for GPT-6.1 Sol, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Muse Spark Open vs GPT-6.1 Sol comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 15 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further