Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Muse Spark Open vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Muse Spark Open (Meta) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 October 2026

As of 15 October 2026, Muse Spark Open holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#15 vs #18); MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 4.9× cheaper per output token ($0.87/1M vs $4.25/1M); and MiMo-V2.6-Pro ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Muse Spark Open if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #15 against #18 (79.6 vs 78.8 points).
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Spark Open was listed 15 October 2026, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 21 September 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro if…

  • API cost matters — $0.87/1M output tokens against $4.25/1M, about 4.9× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.435/1M against $1.25/1M.
  • you want to self-host: MiMo-V2.6-Pro ships open weights while Muse Spark Open is gated access.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 46.3 against 38.9.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 49.4% against 43.9%.

Muse Spark Open vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Muse Spark Open and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
FieldMuse Spark OpenMetaMiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#15#18
Index score79.678.8
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$1.25$0.435
Output price / 1M tokens$4.25$0.87
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap944K131K
API providers listed44
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioText, Image, Video, Audio
First listed15 October 202621 September 2026
PublisherMetaXiaomi

Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 213 held-out anchors (22%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 11 rows (78%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1 up toward the measured corpus · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Muse Spark Open vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Public benchmark boards where Muse Spark Open or MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a published result
BoardMuse Spark OpenMiMo-V2.6-ProLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)—14791469–1488Not reportedOnly one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)—15371519–1555Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena—3.8%2.6%–5.0%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis38.9X-High46.3ReasoningMiMo-V2.6-Pro
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis76.4%X-High—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis43.9%X-High49.4%ReasoningMiMo-V2.6-Pro

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Muse Spark Open vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: common questions

Is Muse Spark Open better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Muse Spark Open ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 October 2026: #15 against #18. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Muse Spark Open cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on output tokens: $0.87/1M against $4.25/1M. Input tokens are $1.25/1M for Muse Spark Open and $0.435/1M for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.63 for Muse Spark Open versus $1.30 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 71.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark Open or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark Open or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Muse Spark Open and MiMo-V2.6-Pro open-weight models?

Muse Spark Open: Gated access. MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Muse Spark Open and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Muse Spark Open and 4 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Muse Spark Open vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 15 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further