Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

LongCat 2.0 vs Grok 4.7

LongCat 2.0 (Meituan) and Grok 4.7 (xAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Grok 4.7 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#4 vs #15); LongCat 2.0 is 4× cheaper per output token ($1.20/1M vs $4.80/1M); LongCat 2.0 offers the longer context window (1M vs 500K tokens); and LongCat 2.0 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose LongCat 2.0 if…

  • API cost matters — $1.20/1M output tokens against $4.80/1M, about 4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $1.60/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 500K.
  • you want to self-host: LongCat 2.0 ships open weights while Grok 4.7 is api only.

Choose Grok 4.7 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #4 against #15 (84.9 vs 79.5 points).
  • you want the more recently listed model — Grok 4.7 was listed 21 September 2026, LongCat 2.0 20 July 2026.

LongCat 2.0 vs Grok 4.7: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of LongCat 2.0 and Grok 4.7
FieldLongCat 2.0MeituanGrok 4.7xAI
ModelCap Index position#15#4
Index score79.584.9
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$1.60
Output price / 1M tokens$1.20$4.80
Context window1M tokens500K tokens
Max output tokens262K450K
API providers listed11
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, File
First listed20 July 202621 September 2026
PublisherMeituanxAI

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 201 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 1.9 toward the measured corpus · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: LongCat 2.0 vs Grok 4.7

Public benchmark boards where LongCat 2.0 or Grok 4.7 has a published result
BoardLongCat 2.0Grok 4.7Leads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis46.4intelligence-index:v4.3:xhighOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis43.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Grok 4.7 (xhigh)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)37.6%34.0%–41.1%Grok Build · X-HighOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

LongCat 2.0 vs Grok 4.7: common questions

Is LongCat 2.0 better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #4 against #15. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is LongCat 2.0 cheaper than Grok 4.7?

LongCat 2.0 is cheaper on output tokens: $1.20/1M against $4.80/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for LongCat 2.0 and $1.60/1M for Grok 4.7. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.20 for LongCat 2.0 versus $5.60 for Grok 4.7. LongCat 2.0 costs 78.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, LongCat 2.0 or Grok 4.7?

LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 500K.

Which is better for coding, LongCat 2.0 or Grok 4.7?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are LongCat 2.0 and Grok 4.7 open-weight models?

LongCat 2.0: Open weights. Grok 4.7: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run LongCat 2.0 and Grok 4.7?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for LongCat 2.0 and 1 for Grok 4.7, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this LongCat 2.0 vs Grok 4.7 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further