Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

LongCat 2.0 (Meituan) and Qwen3.8 Flash (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 10 September 2026

As of 10 September 2026, LongCat 2.0 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#11 vs #14); Qwen3.8 Flash is 2.6× cheaper per output token ($0.47/1M vs $1.20/1M); and LongCat 2.0 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose LongCat 2.0 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #11 against #14 (79.0 vs 78.0 points).
  • you want to self-host: LongCat 2.0 ships open weights while Qwen3.8 Flash is restricted license.

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.47/1M output tokens against $1.20/1M, about 2.6× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.30/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.8 Flash was listed 26 August 2026, LongCat 2.0 20 July 2026.

LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of LongCat 2.0 and Qwen3.8 Flash
FieldLongCat 2.0MeituanQwen3.8 FlashQwen
ModelCap Index position#11#14
Index score79.078.0
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$0.15
Output price / 1M tokens$1.20$0.47
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens262K131K
API providers listed12
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
First listed20 July 202626 August 2026
PublisherMeituanQwen

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 183 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 1.9 toward the measured corpus · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Public benchmark boards where LongCat 2.0 or Qwen3.8 Flash has a published result
BoardLongCat 2.0Qwen3.8 FlashLeads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis39.9intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis86.1%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.8-Flash-Next":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis38.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.8-Flash-Next":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: common questions

Is LongCat 2.0 better than Qwen3.8 Flash?

LongCat 2.0 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 10 September 2026: #11 against #14. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is LongCat 2.0 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.47/1M against $1.20/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for LongCat 2.0 and $0.15/1M for Qwen3.8 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.20 for LongCat 2.0 versus $0.53 for Qwen3.8 Flash. Qwen3.8 Flash costs 55.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, LongCat 2.0 or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, LongCat 2.0 or Qwen3.8 Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are LongCat 2.0 and Qwen3.8 Flash open-weight models?

LongCat 2.0: Open weights. Qwen3.8 Flash: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run LongCat 2.0 and Qwen3.8 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for LongCat 2.0 and 2 for Qwen3.8 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 10 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further