Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

LongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

LongCat 2.0 (Meituan) and GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, LongCat 2.0 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#13 vs #14); GLM 5.3 Flash is 4.8× cheaper per output token ($0.25/1M vs $1.20/1M); and GLM 5.3 Flash offers the longer context window (1.3M vs 1M tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose LongCat 2.0 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #13 against #14 (79.0 vs 78.7 points).

Choose GLM 5.3 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.25/1M output tokens against $1.20/1M, about 4.8× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.075/1M against $0.30/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1.3M tokens against 1M.
  • you want provider choice — 26 listed API providers against 1.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GLM 5.3 Flash was listed 26 August 2026, LongCat 2.0 20 July 2026.

LongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of LongCat 2.0 and GLM 5.3 Flash
FieldLongCat 2.0MeituanGLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai
ModelCap Index position#13#14
Index score79.078.7
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$0.075
Output price / 1M tokens$1.20$0.25
Context window1M tokens1.3M tokens
Max output tokens262K131K
API providers listed126
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
First listed20 July 202626 August 2026
PublisherMeituanZ.ai

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2 toward the measured corpus · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: LongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Public benchmark boards where LongCat 2.0 or GLM 5.3 Flash has a published result
BoardLongCat 2.0GLM 5.3 FlashLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15341517–1551Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena2.0%1.1%–2.9%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis41.9intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis84.3%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GLM-5.3-Flash":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis39.9%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GLM-5.3-Flash":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

LongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: common questions

Is LongCat 2.0 better than GLM 5.3 Flash?

LongCat 2.0 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #13 against #14. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is LongCat 2.0 cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.25/1M against $1.20/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for LongCat 2.0 and $0.075/1M for GLM 5.3 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.20 for LongCat 2.0 versus $0.28 for GLM 5.3 Flash. GLM 5.3 Flash costs 77.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, LongCat 2.0 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window: 1.3M tokens against 1M.

Which is better for coding, LongCat 2.0 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are LongCat 2.0 and GLM 5.3 Flash open-weight models?

LongCat 2.0: Open weights. GLM 5.3 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run LongCat 2.0 and GLM 5.3 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for LongCat 2.0 and 26 for GLM 5.3 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this LongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further