Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

LongCat 2.0 vs Kimi K3

LongCat 2.0 (Meituan) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Kimi K3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#6 vs #10); LongCat 2.0 is 12.5× cheaper per output token ($1.20/1M vs $15.00/1M); and LongCat 2.0 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose LongCat 2.0 if…

  • API cost matters — $1.20/1M output tokens against $15.00/1M, about 12.5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $3.00/1M.
  • you want to self-host: LongCat 2.0 ships open weights while Kimi K3 is restricted license.
  • you want the more recently listed model — LongCat 2.0 was listed 20 July 2026, Kimi K3 16 July 2026.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #6 against #10 (82.6 vs 79.0 points).
  • you want provider choice — 16 listed API providers against 1.

LongCat 2.0 vs Kimi K3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of LongCat 2.0 and Kimi K3
FieldLongCat 2.0MeituanKimi K3Moonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#10#6
Index score79.082.6
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$3.00
Output price / 1M tokens$1.20$15.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens262K944K
API providers listed116
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
First listed20 July 202616 July 2026
PublisherMeituanMoonshot AI

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2 toward the measured corpus · 6 public benchmark observations across 6 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: LongCat 2.0 vs Kimi K3

Public benchmark boards where LongCat 2.0 or Kimi K3 has a published result
BoardLongCat 2.0Kimi K3Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15421533–1551MaxOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena6.6%5.9%–7.3%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation60.4%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis43.8intelligence-index:v4.3:maxOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis85.0%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Kimi K3 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis46.9%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Kimi K3 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench54.5Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

LongCat 2.0 vs Kimi K3: common questions

Is LongCat 2.0 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #6 against #10. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is LongCat 2.0 cheaper than Kimi K3?

LongCat 2.0 is cheaper on output tokens: $1.20/1M against $15.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for LongCat 2.0 and $3.00/1M for Kimi K3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.20 for LongCat 2.0 versus $13.50 for Kimi K3. LongCat 2.0 costs 91.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, LongCat 2.0 or Kimi K3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, LongCat 2.0 or Kimi K3?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are LongCat 2.0 and Kimi K3 open-weight models?

LongCat 2.0: Open weights. Kimi K3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run LongCat 2.0 and Kimi K3?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for LongCat 2.0 and 16 for Kimi K3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this LongCat 2.0 vs Kimi K3 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further