Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiMo V2 Flash

Ling 3.0 Flash VL (InclusionAI) and MiMo V2 Flash (XiaomiMiMo) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, Ling 3.0 Flash VL holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#45 vs #47).

Which should you choose?

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash VL if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #45 against #47 (61.8 vs 61.1 points).
  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 64.4% against 61.8%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 22.0% against 8.6%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Ling 3.0 Flash VL was listed 10 September 2026, MiMo V2 Flash 16 December 2025.

Choose MiMo V2 Flash if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which MiMo V2 Flash leads Ling 3.0 Flash VL for this pair.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiMo V2 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Ling 3.0 Flash VL and MiMo V2 Flash
FieldLing 3.0 Flash VLInclusionAIMiMo V2 FlashXiaomiMiMo
ModelCap Index position#45#47
Index score61.861.1
EvidenceEstimatedEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.06Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens$0.18Unlisted
Context window131K tokens— tokens
Max output tokens33K
API providers listed10
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
First listed10 September 202616 December 2025
PublisherInclusionAIXiaomiMiMo

Evidence: 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (60%); global-corpus-prior over 176 held-out anchors (40%); shrunk 6.2 toward the measured corpus · global-corpus-prior over 176 held-out anchors (13%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 10 rows (87%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 10 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.5 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiMo V2 Flash

Public benchmark boards where Ling 3.0 Flash VL or MiMo V2 Flash has a published result
BoardLing 3.0 Flash VLMiMo V2 FlashLeads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis25.0intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis64.4%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Ling-3.0-flash-VL":reasoning=true61.8%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseLing 3.0 Flash VL
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis83.9%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis22.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Ling-3.0-flash-VL":reasoning=true8.6%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseLing 3.0 Flash VL

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiMo V2 Flash: common questions

Is Ling 3.0 Flash VL better than MiMo V2 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #45 against #47. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash VL cheaper than MiMo V2 Flash?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or MiMo V2 Flash?

Both publish a 131K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or MiMo V2 Flash?

AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: Ling 3.0 Flash VL 64.4%, MiMo V2 Flash 61.8% — Ling 3.0 Flash VL leads.

Are Ling 3.0 Flash VL and MiMo V2 Flash open-weight models?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: Open weights. MiMo V2 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Ling 3.0 Flash VL and MiMo V2 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and 0 for MiMo V2 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiMo V2 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further