Skip to content
ModelCap

MiMo V2 Flash

Current board #45Official publisher releaseOpen weights7d #44 → #45

XiaomiMiMo·XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo V2 Flash is ModelCap current-board rank #45 with Index 61.6 (Modeled · peer benchmarks), from the ModelCap Index as of 10 Sept 2026, 00:20 UTC.

MiMo V2 Flash weight access is open weights, from ModelCap classification of published repository metadata as of 10 Sept 2026, 00:20 UTC.

Snapshot facts · download the public dataset · methodology

ModelCap Index · Current board
61.6#45
Estimated · 40% support · score interval 51.3–71.9
No admitted evaluation publication timestamp yet
Market Gravity
14.4Increased by 5.1
Secondary market signal

OpenRouter endpoint status could not be refreshed. This model is not treated as currently served until a successful observation arrives.

Input
Self-hosted
weights only · no listed API price
Output
Self-hosted
weights only · no listed API price
Context
tokens
Providers
0
endpoints
Gateway spend
latest · Vercel share

Providers

Uptime measured over the last 30 minutes

Current provider status is unavailable.

Reported evaluation leads (2)

Not independent measurement

Structured rows reported in this exact model repository at the pinned revision below. They are the publisher talking about itself: never measured evidence, never a score input on their own. Rows marked as used were laddered against independently measured peers inside the launch-card channel of this model's modeled placement, with the replay-measured optimism haircut applied; the others played no part.

Dataset / taskMetricValueRevisionProvenance
cais/hle
hle
22.1
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
Idavidrein/gpqa
diamond
83.3333
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate

ModelCap Index · Current board

Methodology
61.6
Modeled · peer benchmarks · calibrated architecture-and-release-era fallback from static public metadata
Current board
#45
Public rank basis
Modeled · peer benchmarks (architecture)
Index support
40.0% · limited
Index interval
51.3–71.9
Rank posterior
Not available
Top 5 / Top 10 probability
Not available / Not available
Posterior as of
Snapshot timestamp unavailable
Evidence as of
No admitted evaluation publication timestamp
Identity binding
Exact catalogue product · xiaomimimo/XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2-Flash/fp8 · aggregates disclosed benchmark configurations · endpoint configuration not claimed · artifact metadata XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2-Flash@1afd314a2406c282e0956375c34a676501c78649 (not the evaluation revision)
Index observations used
0
Qualified Index evidence point
61.6
How this position was produced · fused launch placement

No general-family board lists this model yet. Its point estimate is the precision-weighted mean of every channel that spoke for it; each channel’s share is the weight it carried. Independent measurements replace this placement as boards list the model.

Fused estimate
61.6 ± 8.1
Independent share
0%
Shrink toward corpus
-1.3
Peer ceiling share
10%
Optimism haircut
None required · cross lab probe, 5 probes
Method
precision-weighted-v1
Channels fused into this model’s launch placement
ChannelEstimateShare
Publisher corpus prior · not independent
global-corpus-prior over 183 held-out anchors
52.6 ± 22.912%
Launch card against resolved peers · not independent
launch card against 4 resolved peers on 10 rows
62.9 ± 8.688%
  • · Launch card row aime-2025: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row gpqa-diamond: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row hle-without-tools: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row hmmt-feb-2025: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row livecodebench-v-6: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row mmlu-pro: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row swe-bench-multilingual: claims above every resolved peer
  • · Launch card row swe-bench-verified: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row terminal-bench-2-0: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row terminal-bench-hard: inside the resolved peer range
Bayesian Evidence Score · measured evidence input only

BES normalizes admitted public benchmark evidence for measured Index rows. Its legacy score and observables prior do not define the public language rank.

Observed capability
Evidence status
No admitted measured evidence
General preference
Coding
Agents & tools
Reasoning
Evidence breadth
0%
Evidence coverage
0%
Market and catalogue signals · secondary, never the language Index rank
Usage (OpenRouter popularity)
Liquidity (providers × uptime)
Open reach (HF downloads)
84.1
Surface (context / tools / modalities)
0.0
Freshness
36.1
  • · HF 30d downloads 93287
  • · Catalogue surface
  • · First seen 2025-12-16

These adoption and deployment observations remain context only. They do not change this model's ModelCap Index score or rank.

The bounded 0–100 capability score blends each source’s competitive placement with its published achievement, then combines capability families. Evidence breadth adds a modest uncertainty adjustment; price and popularity are not part of benchmark-led rank.

Experimental capability estimate

Estimate policy
49.3
29.6–69.0 uncertainty interval
Excluded from rank
Confidence
68%
Training support
188 models · 107 lineages
Out-of-domain check
in domain
Feature coverage
71%
Lineage-held-out error
10.3 MAE

Experimental estimate. This layer predicts from admitted evidence and safe metadata only. It never enters ModelCap Score or rank.

Deployment readiness

Metadata index
47.9
partial · 52% metadata coverage
Not capability
Artifact reproducibility
85.0
Access & legal clarity
100.0
Deployability
8.0
Evaluation provenance
0.0

Missing: artifactReproducibility.base-lineage, deployability.independent-provider-records, deployability.measured-provider-uptime, deployability.published-provider-pricing, deployability.declared-capacity, evaluationProvenance.admitted-evaluation-observations, evaluationProvenance.capability-family-breadth, evaluationProvenance.evaluation-source-diversity, evaluationProvenance.identity-and-source-confidence, evaluationProvenance.evaluation-dataset-revisions.

A metadata completeness and deployability index—not a safety certification, quality grade, or production-readiness claim.

Market activity

Venue coverage
Market Gravity
14.4
OpenRouter weekly popularity
Not listed

Market Gravity uses OpenRouter’s full-catalogue popularity order. Sparse Vercel top-ten observations appear only when published and do not affect the score.

Arena preference

No matched Arena rating

This model is visible because it is available in the live catalogue, but it has no trustworthy community result yet. ModelCap does not infer a quality score from price, features, or market activity.

Market Gravity breakdown

Usage55%
0.0

OpenRouter weekly popularity across the full model catalogue.

Liquidity25%
0.0

Independent providers versus the model's open or closed cohort, weighted by uptime.

Open reach15%
84.1

Hugging Face 30-day downloads for open models; neutral for closed models.

Freshness5%
36.1

Time since first public availability, on a six-month half-life.

Specification

Context window
tokens
Max output
Inputs
Text
Outputs
Text
Tokenizer
Cached input tokens
Not offered
First seen on OpenRouter
16 Dec 2025

Capabilities

  • Not supported: Reasoning
  • Not supported: Tool use
  • Not supported: Structured output
  • Not supported: Response format
  • Not supported: Moderated

Weights & access

Open weights. Downloadable weights are published under an OSI or free-culture license in the current repository metadata. This describes weight availability, not whether the full training stack qualifies as Open Source AI.

Access
Open weights
Licence
mit
Pinned revision
1afd314a2406
Parameters
309.8B
Architecture
MiMoV2FlashForCausalLM
Model type
mimo_v2_flash
Hugging Face downloads (30d)
93K
Downloads (all time)
1.2M
Likes
750
Repository updated
9 Jul 2026, 04:25 UTC

Compare MiMo V2 Flash with

Pick any model

Benchmark leaderboards featuring MiMo V2 Flash

All leaderboards
Public benchmark boards on which MiMo V2 Flash has a published result
LeaderboardScoreSource rankConfigurationPublished
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Artificial Analysis run)Artificial Analysis61.8%#93 of 236terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=false9 Sept 2026
τ²-Bench Telecom (Artificial Analysis run)Artificial Analysis83.9%#110 of 436tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=false9 Sept 2026
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Artificial Analysis8.6%#306 of 603hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=false9 Sept 2026

Alternatives to MiMo V2 Flash, by the numbers

Ranked neighbours

Models within 3 places of #45 on the ModelCap Index.

MiMo V2 Flash: common questions

How does MiMo V2 Flash rank among AI models?

MiMo V2 Flash holds ModelCap Index position #45 of 166 ranked language models as of 10 September 2026, with an Index score of 61.6 (interval 51.3–71.9); evidence: modeled · peer benchmarks. The Index combines public benchmark boards with published uncertainty; the methodology page explains the weighting.

How much does MiMo V2 Flash cost per 1M tokens?

No live API price is listed for MiMo V2 Flash in the current snapshot as of 10 September 2026 because the latest endpoint refresh was unavailable. ModelCap shows a price only when a provider currently lists one.

Is MiMo V2 Flash open-weight?

Open weights (mit). Downloadable weights are published under an OSI or free-culture license in the current repository metadata. This describes weight availability, not whether the full training stack qualifies as Open Source AI. The repository is XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2-Flash on Hugging Face.

Which benchmarks has MiMo V2 Flash been evaluated on?

MiMo V2 Flash has published results on 3 public boards tracked by ModelCap as of 10 September 2026: AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 61.8% (#93 of 236), AA τ²-Bench Telecom 83.9% (#110 of 436) and AA Humanity's Last Exam 8.6% (#306 of 603). Each board page ranks every tracked model on that benchmark; the ModelCap Index combines them with published uncertainty.

How does MiMo V2 Flash compare with gemma 4 12B it?

MiMo V2 Flash ranks #45 (Index 61.6) and gemma 4 12B it ranks #46 (Index 61.4) on the ModelCap Index as of 10 September 2026. The head-to-head page lines up their benchmarks, listed prices, context windows and provider counts side by side.

When was MiMo V2 Flash released?

MiMo V2 Flash first appeared in the catalogue on 16 Dec 2025. It is the current version in its family. Rank and price movements since then are recorded on the site's changes feed.