Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Gemini 3.8 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#9 vs #10); MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 13.4× cheaper per output token ($0.28/1M vs $3.75/1M); and MiMo-V2.6-Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #9 against #10 (84.5 vs 84.4 points).

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.28/1M output tokens against $3.75/1M, about 13.4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.14/1M against $0.75/1M.
  • you want to self-host: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ships open weights while Gemini 3.8 Flash is api only.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiMo-V2.6-Flash was listed 21 September 2026, Gemini 3.8 Flash 2 September 2026.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
FieldGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleMiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#9#10
Index score84.584.4
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.75$0.14
Output price / 1M tokens$3.75$0.28
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens66K131K
API providers listed22
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioText, Image, Video, Audio
First listed2 September 202621 September 2026
PublisherGoogleXiaomi

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · publisher-corpus-prior over 208 held-out anchors (8%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 7 rows (92%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 7 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.7 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.8 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a published result
BoardGemini 3.8 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15351519–1551HighOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena4.7%2.8%–6.6%HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis40.9intelligence-index:v4.3:highOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis47.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)19.1%15.7%–22.5%mini-SWE-agent · HighOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: common questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #9 against #10. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.28/1M against $3.75/1M. Input tokens are $0.75/1M for Gemini 3.8 Flash and $0.14/1M for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $3.38 for Gemini 3.8 Flash versus $0.42 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 87.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash open-weight models?

Gemini 3.8 Flash: API only. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 2 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.8 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further