Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) and GPT-6.1 Terra (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, Gemini 3.8 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#6 vs #29); and Gemini 3.8 Flash is 1.2× cheaper per output token ($4.13/1M vs $5.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #6 against #29 (83.3 vs 75.4 points).
  • API cost matters — $4.13/1M output tokens against $5.00/1M, about 1.2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.825/1M against $1.00/1M.

Choose GPT-6.1 Terra if…

  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 2.
  • LMArena Agent is your yardstick — 11.4% against 2.6%.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 51.3 against 30.8.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-6.1 Terra was listed 26 October 2026, Gemini 3.8 Flash 2 September 2026.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-6.1 Terra
FieldGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleGPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#6#29
Index score83.375.4
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.825$1.00
Output price / 1M tokens$4.13$5.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap66K128K
API providers listed23
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioFile, Image, Text
First listed2 September 202626 October 2026
PublisherGoogleOpenAI

Evidence: 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards · 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (21%); publisher-corpus-prior over 210 held-out anchors (14%); opens above measured predecessor openai/gpt-5.6-terra on same-family ordering evidence (53%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.5% support (12%); shrunk 3.5 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-6.1 Terra has a published result
BoardGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-6.1 TerraLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14961492–1500High—Only one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15301523–1537High—Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena2.6%1.8%–3.4%High11.4%10.0%–12.8%MaxGPT-6.1 Terra
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation89.2%High—Only one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation10.4%High—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis30.8High51.3MaxGPT-6.1 Terra
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)19.1%15.7%–22.5%mini-SWE-agent · High—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra: common questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than GPT-6.1 Terra?

Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #6 against #29. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $4.13/1M against $5.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.825/1M for Gemini 3.8 Flash and $1.00/1M for GPT-6.1 Terra. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $3.71 for Gemini 3.8 Flash versus $4.50 for GPT-6.1 Terra. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 17.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-6.1 Terra?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-6.1 Terra?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-6.1 Terra open-weight models?

Gemini 3.8 Flash: No linked weights. GPT-6.1 Terra: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-6.1 Terra?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3 for GPT-6.1 Terra, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further