Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3

GPT-6.1 Terra (OpenAI) and GLM 5.3 (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, GLM 5.3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#20 vs #29); and GLM 5.3 is 3.6× cheaper per output token ($1.40/1M vs $5.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-6.1 Terra if…

  • LMArena Agent is your yardstick — 11.4% against 1.1%.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 51.3 against 31.7.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-6.1 Terra was listed 26 October 2026, GLM 5.3 18 August 2026.

Choose GLM 5.3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #20 against #29 (79.5 vs 75.4 points).
  • API cost matters — $1.40/1M output tokens against $5.00/1M, about 3.6× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.07/1M against $1.00/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 35 listed API providers against 3.

GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-6.1 Terra and GLM 5.3
FieldGPT-6.1 TerraOpenAIGLM 5.3Z.ai
ModelCap Index position#29#20
Index score75.479.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$1.00$0.07
Output price / 1M tokens$5.00$1.40
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap128K944K
API providers listed335
Weight accessNo linked weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextText
First listed26 October 202618 August 2026
PublisherOpenAIZ.ai

Evidence: 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (21%); publisher-corpus-prior over 210 held-out anchors (14%); opens above measured predecessor openai/gpt-5.6-terra on same-family ordering evidence (53%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.5% support (12%); shrunk 3.5 toward the measured corpus · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3

Public benchmark boards where GPT-6.1 Terra or GLM 5.3 has a published result
BoardGPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3Leads
Arena textArena (LMArena)—14811476–1486MaxOnly one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)—15201512–1528MaxOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena11.4%10.0%–12.8%Max1.1%0.3%–1.9%MaxGPT-6.1 Terra
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis51.3Max31.7MaxGPT-6.1 Terra
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)—41.8%38.6%–45.1%Claude Code · MaxOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3: common questions

Is GPT-6.1 Terra better than GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #20 against #29. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is GPT-6.1 Terra cheaper than GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3 is cheaper on output tokens: $1.40/1M against $5.00/1M. Input tokens are $1.00/1M for GPT-6.1 Terra and $0.07/1M for GLM 5.3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.50 for GPT-6.1 Terra versus $0.84 for GLM 5.3. GLM 5.3 costs 81.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6.1 Terra or GLM 5.3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, GPT-6.1 Terra or GLM 5.3?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are GPT-6.1 Terra and GLM 5.3 open-weight models?

GPT-6.1 Terra: No linked weights. GLM 5.3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run GPT-6.1 Terra and GLM 5.3?

ModelCap currently lists 3 API providers for GPT-6.1 Terra and 35 for GLM 5.3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further