Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, MiMo-V2.6-Pro holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#19 vs #30); and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.4× cheaper per output token ($0.87/1M vs $4.66/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 if…

  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.117/1M against $0.435/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 21 listed API providers against 5.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #19 against #30 (79.7 vs 75.1 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.87/1M output tokens against $4.66/1M, about 5.4× cheaper.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1480 against 1465.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1538 against 1505.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 29.9 against 23.1.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiMo-V2.6-Pro was listed 21 September 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 12 August 2026.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
FieldDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekMiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#30#19
Index score75.179.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.117$0.435
Output price / 1M tokens$4.66$0.87
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap944K131K
API providers listed215
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
First listed12 August 202621 September 2026
PublisherDeepSeekXiaomi

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.6-ProLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14651458–1472High14801470–1489Not reportedMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15051493–1516High15381521–1556MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena AgentLMArena—2.7%1.8%–3.6%Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation61.3%Max—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis23.1Max29.9ReasoningMiMo-V2.6-Pro

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #19 against #30. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on output tokens: $0.87/1M against $4.66/1M. Input tokens are $0.117/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $0.435/1M for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.56 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $1.30 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 49.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Arena coding: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1505, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1538 — MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads.

Are DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Open weights. MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 21 API providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 5 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further